Legal Opinion

Jessup v. . Nixon

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 12, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaRKsoN, J.

Tbis action bas been twice before tbis Court — 186 N. C., p. 100; 193 N. 0., p. 830. On tbe second appeal it was said-: “Tbe defendant’s exception to tbe refusal of tbe trial court to grant bis motion for judgment as of nonsuit was duly presented on tbe original bearing, but was not sustained. Certain peremptory instructions were -beid to be erroneous.. Hence, tbe necessary effect of tbe rulings was to remand tbe cause for a new trial, the appeal being from a judgment rendered on a verdict of the jury, and the demurrer to the evidence not being sustained.”

The record discloses: That Francis…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Winchester v. . WinchesterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Highsmith v. . WhitehurstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  3. Russell v. . RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jessup v. NixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Jessup v. . NixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Empie v. . EmpieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API