Legal Opinion

Diggs v. Shulkin

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided July 14, 2017No. 2016-2243Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Reyna, Circuit Judge.

Woodrow Diggs appeals a decision of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. Mr. Diggs argues that the Veterans Court erred by applying an improper legal standard in concluding that Mr, Diggs had not filed a substantive appeal, Because the Veterans Court applied the correct legal standard, we affirm.

Background

1. Mr. Diggs’ Military Service

In June 1970, Mr. Diggs entered active duty military service. In July 1970, Mr. Diggs was admitted to the U.S. Army Hospital, Fort Polk, Louisiana for psychiatric evaluation. J.A, 76-79. The treating physician diagnosed Mr. Diggs with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Douglas v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
  2. Mayfield v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  3. Willsey v. PeakeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  4. Singleton v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  5. Leland E. Gibson v. James B. PeakeUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API