Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Reilly

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 1988PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*552OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether section 315 of the Pennsylvania Crimes Code, 18 Pa.C.S. § 315,1 which places the burden of proving insanity upon the criminal defendant by a preponderance of the evidence, violates Article I, section 9 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, which assures all persons due process of law. Despite the requirement that the prosecution prove each element of the crime charged, we do not believe that section 315 improperly places the burden upon the defendant to prove an element of the offense; and thus we reject appellant’s attack…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GribbleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. HenrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. PiggSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API