Legal Opinion

Rose v. Rose

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1979No. 3-778A171PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge.

This is an interlocutory appeal in which Thomas and Grace Rose, defendants-appellants herein, appeal from denial of a motion for summary judgment and a motion in limine.

The trial court certified the following issues on appeal: whether there exists a material question of fact precluding summary judgment and whether parol evidence should be admitted to explain appellee’s intent in executing a release. Disposition of the first issue herein renders the second issue moot.

Plaintiff-appellee Dale Rose is the son of appellants. Dale commenced this action to recover for personal…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Western & Southern Life Insurance v. ValeIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Robison v. Fickle, Extr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Wecker v. KilmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Lazarrus v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Reagan v. DuganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grimm v. FD Borkholder Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Indiana Bell Telephone Co., Inc. v. MygrantIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Mullen v. TuckerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Wedzeb Enterprises, Inc. v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Indiana Bell Telephone Co. v. MygrantIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API