Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Douglas

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 13, 2000No. 17939-7-IIIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, J.

Glenna and Robert Schwartz’s complaint against Orval 1 and Esther Douglas was filed and served on Ms. Douglas after Mr. Douglas had died, shortly before the running of the applicable statute of limitations. Although the Schwartzes later amended their complaint to add Mr. Douglas’s estate as a defendant, the trial court dismissed the action as untimely. The Schwartzes appeal, contending the statute of limitations was tolled by service on the surviving spouse. Alternatively, they assert that the amended complaint should relate back to the date the original complaint was filed. We reverse and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Julius Korn v. Royal Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. PUD NO. 1 OF KLICKITAT CTY. v. Walbrook Ins. Co. Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Young v. Estate of SnellWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Dorothy L. Hendrix v. Memorial Hospital of Galveston CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Costello v. CaslerNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Pierce v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Anne M. Price v. Stacy GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  4. Perrin v. StenslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. LaRue v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API