Legal Opinion
Antioch Co. v. Western Trimming Corp.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 21, 2002No. C-3-98-236PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANT’S RENEWED MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #122); DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING, AS MOOT, DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF ATTORNEY JEFFREY STANDLEY (DOC. #135); JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF; TERMINATION ENTRY
RICE, Chief Judge.
The Plaintiff brings this litigation under § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), and the law of Ohio. In its First Claim for Relief, the Plaintiff contends that the Defendant is violating § 43(a), by copying the Plaintiffs product configura tion trade…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- The Antioch Company v. Western Trimming CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- The Straumann Co. v. Lifecore Biomedical Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Antioch Company v. Western TrimmingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003