Legal Opinion
In re Consolidated Rock Products Co.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 3, 1941No. 25816-HPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLZER, District Judge.
The debtor’s attorneys have petitioned the court for an order authorizing the debtor to make certain expense advances to said attorneys by reason of a trip to and from Washington, D. C., for the purpose of appearing before the United States Supreme Court on behalf of said debtor. The Securities and Exchange Commission, which is appearing in this proceeding with the Court’s approval, has interposed objections to the allowance of such expense upon the ground that because of the purchase of stock of the debtor by its attorneys since the commencement of these proceedings…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Michoud v. GirodSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
- Magruder v. DrurySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- American United Mutual Life Insurance v. City of Avon ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- In Re Paramount-Publix CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935
- Otis & Co. v. Insurance Bldg. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Equitable Office Bldg. CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949