Randle v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERTSON, Justice.
Appellant was indicted for the felony offense of aggravated robbery and was convicted by a jury following a plea of not guilty. Punishment was assessed by the *792jury at life imprisonment after finding both enhancement paragraphs of the indictment true. We affirm.
Appellant’s sole point of error alleges that his trial counsel was ineffective since he failed to timely convey appellant’s acceptance of the state’s plea bargain offer. The motion for new trial, at which the state’s prosecutor, the defense attorney and the appellant testified, presents the following sequence…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Ex Parte WilsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Flores v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Cisneros v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
3Cited by2 opinions
- Randle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Handle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993