Legal Opinion

Randle v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 9, 1991No. C14-90-339-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERTSON, Justice.

Appellant was indicted for the felony offense of aggravated robbery and was convicted by a jury following a plea of not guilty. Punishment was assessed by the *792jury at life imprisonment after finding both enhancement paragraphs of the indictment true. We affirm.

Appellant’s sole point of error alleges that his trial counsel was ineffective since he failed to timely convey appellant’s acceptance of the state’s plea bargain offer. The motion for new trial, at which the state’s prosecutor, the defense attorney and the appellant testified, presents the following sequence…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Ex Parte WilsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Flores v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Cisneros v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Randle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Handle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API