Legal Opinion
Domson, Inc. v. Kadrmas Lee & Jackson, Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 19, 2018No. 28401PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEVERSON, Retired Justice
[¶1.] Domson, Inc. brought suit against Dakota Engineering and Kadrmas, Lee and Jackson (KLJ) for professional negligence.1 Dakota Engineering and KLJ moved for summary judgment. During the hearing, Dakota Engineering/KLJ asserted that a clause in the contract between Domson and the Oglala Sioux Tribe insulated them from liability for negligence to *399Domson. The circuit court agreed and separately granted Dakota Engineering and KLJ summary judgment. Domson appeals. We requested supplemental briefing from the parties on the enforceability of exculpatory clauses…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- AR Moyer, Inc. v. GrahamSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Kunkel v. United Security Ins. Co. of New JerseySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- Holzer v. Dakota Speedway, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Mid-Western Electric, Inc. v. DeWild Grant Reckert & Associates Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dysart v. Dragpipe SaloonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Culhane v. ThovsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2026
- Grand River Cooperative Grazing Association v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2020
- Muth Electric, Inc. v. Rice Lake West, Inc., Federal Insurance Company; Rice Lake West, Inc. f/k/a Stanek Constructors, Inc. v. City of Pierre, South Dakota; City of Pierre, South Dakota v. Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2025