Ruthena Williams, Etc. v. The Honorable C. P. Rubiera
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RONEY, Circuit Judge:
This suit sought a United States district court declaratory decree that state welfare fraud defendants are constitutionally entitled to appointed counsel in cases in which the sentence is a fine, but not imprisonment. Such misdemeanor defendants are entitled to counsel under Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25, 92 S.Ct. 2006, 32 L.Ed.2d 530 (1972), if the sentence may be imprisonment. The alleged pattern and practice in Florida as to convicted welfare recipients, however, is to place them on probation and order them to pay back a portion of the defrauded funds each month.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Joseph A. ex rel. Corrine Wolfe v. IngramCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- The News-Journal Corporation, a Florida Corporation v. Honorable S. James Foxman, Circuit Judge, Seventh Judicial Circuit, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Samuel Gibson, III v. George L. Jackson, Individually and as Superior Court Judge of Jones County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Brown v. JonesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1979
- Joseph A. v. Lawrence B. IngramCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.