Legal Opinion

Wallace v. City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 29, 2004No. 03 C 2296PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DER-YEGHIAYAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on Defendants Kriston Kato’s (“Kato”) and Eugene Roy’s (“Roy”) second motion for summary judgment and motion for leave to amend their answer to the amended complaint. For the reasons stated below, we grant the motion for leave to amend the answer and grant the motion for summary judgment in its entirety.

BACKGROUND

On January 19, 1994, Roy and Kato, detectives for the Chicago Police Department, were assigned to investigate the murder of John Herbert Handy (“Handy”). The police reports indicated that Handy had been…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lietzow v. Village of HuntleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Moore v. The City of Bonners FerryDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2023
  3. Thomas v. MillerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API