Meyermac Elmhurst, Inc. v. Esnard
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the restoration of a building permit revoked by respondent Olin, petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buschmann, J.), dated June 29,1984, which, upon respondents’ cross motion, dismissed the proceeding.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Special Term properly dismissed the proceeding for failure to exhaust administrative remedies (see, Watergate II Apts, v Buffalo Sewer Auth., 46 NY2d 52; Young Men’s Christian Assn, v Rochester Pure Waters Dist., 37 NY2d 371). Prior to commencing the instant CPLR article 78…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Watergate II Apartments v. Buffalo Sewer AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Rochester Pure Waters DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Matter of Towers Man. Corp. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Perosi Homes, Inc. v. ManiscalcoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Valentino v. O'ConnellNew York Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rattner v. Planning Commission of Village of PleasantvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Rosenberg v. 135 Willow Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Vandoros v. HatzimichalisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987