Legal Opinion

Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Alabama Gas Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 28, 2012No. 1110346PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Southern Division (“the federal district court”), has certified to this Court the following question pursuant to Rule 18, Ala. R.App. P.:

“Under Alabama law, is a ‘Potentially Responsible Party’ (‘PRP’) letter from the Environmental Protection Agency (‘EPA’), in accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (‘CERCLA’) provisions, sufficient to satisfy the ‘suit’ requirement under a liability policy of insurance?”

We answer this question in the affirmative.

I. Facts and Procedural…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Wilkie v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Maury A. Ryan, D/B/A Ryan, Klimek, Ryan Partnership v. Royal Insurance Company of America, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. Hazen Paper Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. Lapham-Hickey Steel Corp. v. Protection Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Arnold v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2017
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. BrittSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
  3. Parker v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  4. Ware v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2016
  5. McGinnes Industrial Maintenance Corporation v. the Phoenix Insurance Company and the Travelers Indemnity CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API