Legal Opinion

Cochran v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 30, 1906No. 2,082PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Error to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Oklahoma.

1Opinion of the Court

VAN DEVANTER, Circuit Judge.

H. D. Cochran anti. Emmett Blevins, who are not shown to be Indians, were convicted in a district court of the territory of Oklahoma, while it was exercising the jurisdiction of the circuit and district courts of the United States, of the larceny of personal goods within an Indian reservation in that territory, and the judgment has been affirmed by the territorial Supreme Court, 14 Okl. 108, 76 Pac. 672.

The case is now before us upon a writ of error to the latter court.

The first question presented, whether the offense was one against the United States, under Rev.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. In Re BonnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Miles v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Reagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hearne v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  2. Hunter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  3. United States v. North Pac. Wharves & Trading Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API