Legal Opinion
Van Der Oef v. Van Der Oef
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 21, 1963No. Civ. 26323PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.
Grace S. Van Der Oef appeals from an order in probate denying her petition for a family allowance from the estate of her deceased husband. She sought an allowance of $350 per month for her support and $350 as attorneys’ fees “as a part of her support.”
Petitioner was living with and supported by her husband at the time of his death. There are ample assets in the estate to meet her demands and there is no one else who is entitled to a family allowance. After the hearing the court made findings from which it concluded as follows: “I. That the petitioner, Grace S. Van Der Oef, is not entitled to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re the Guardianship of the Person & Estate of BundyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Estate of FiltzerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Estate of SecordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Minier v. MarcouxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Estate of BevelleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Estate of CatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Wiedemann v. WiedemannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Estate of WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Schumacher v. City National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Estate of SchumacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971