Givens Marine Survival Co. v. Givens (In Re Givens)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
ARTHUR N. VOTOLATO, Bankruptcy Judge.
Here on the District Court’s remand order requiring us to articulate the basis for our rulings on the following three points:(1) That there exists a legitimate interest that the covenant not to compete is designed to protect. See Durapin, Inc. v. American Prods., Inc., 559 A.2d 1051, 1053 (R.I.1989).(2) That the terms specified in the injunction (e.g., the geographic scope, and the six-year period) were reasonably necessary, under the circumstances, to protect GMS’s legitimate interests, and that they do not impose…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Durapin, Inc. v. American Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
- James A. Patterson and Dorothy A. Patterson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Novus Franchising, Inc. v. TaylorDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Marathon Petroleum Co. v. Chronister Oil Co.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1988
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Scott Keck and Arwen KeckDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Outlaw Laboratory, LP v. DG in PB, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020