Commonwealth v. Arthur
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
LARSEN, Justice.
Appellant was convicted of burglary, robbery, and conspiracy to commit burglary for his participation in the May 16, 1974 burglary and robbery of a law office. [During the commission of these crimes, a secretary in the law office (hereinafter referred to as the “victim”) was injured.] Post-verdict motions were denied and appellant appealed to the Superior Court, arguing that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The Superior Court remanded the case “to the lower court for an evidentiary hearing on appellant’s claim of ineffective assistance…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. TriplettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. MabieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. TervalonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. McNeilSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. GriffinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. BrinkleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.