Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Arthur

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 1980No. 137PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

LARSEN, Justice.

Appellant was convicted of burglary, robbery, and conspiracy to commit burglary for his participation in the May 16, 1974 burglary and robbery of a law office. [During the commission of these crimes, a secretary in the law office (hereinafter referred to as the “victim”) was injured.] Post-verdict motions were denied and appellant appealed to the Superior Court, arguing that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The Superior Court remanded the case “to the lower court for an evidentiary hearing on appellant’s claim of ineffective assistance…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. TriplettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. MabieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. TervalonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. McNeilSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. GriffinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. BrinkleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API