Legal Opinion

Holland v. FEM Elec. Ass'n, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 2001No. NonePublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] David Holland (Holland) was the General Manager and CEO of FEM Electric Association, Inc. (FEM), until August 2, 1999, when he was asked to voluntarily resign or he would be fired in response to employee complaints of personal harassment. Initially, Holland signed the proffered resignation but later rescinded it. The FEM Board of Directors then terminated his employment. The trial court denied both parties’ Motions for Summary Judgment and remanded to the FEM Board of Directors for a post-termination hearing in accordance with FEM Employment Policy § 422. Both…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Nelson v. WEB Water Development Ass'n, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Osterkamp v. Alkota Manufacturing, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Spenner v. CITY OF SIOUX FALLS, SOUTH DAKOTASouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lucarell v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Aberle v. City of AberdeenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Petersen v. ProxyMed, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2008
  4. Zavadil v. Alcoa Extrusions, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2005
  5. Humble v. WyantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API