Legal Opinion
Petersen v. ProxyMed, Inc.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided April 4, 2008No. CIV. 05-4079-KESPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KAREN E. SCHREIER, Chief Judge.
Defendants, ProxyMed, Inc. (ProxyMed) and Jerry Feldman, move for summary judgment on the claims asserted by plaintiff, Penny H. Petersen. Petersen opposes the motion. Defendants’ motion is granted.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
At all times relevant to this action, Petersen was employed by ProxyMed, a company that processes medical and dental claims. 1 Throughout Petersen’s tenure at ProxyMed she received favorable reviews and also received job promotions on more than one occasion. Petersen was under the supervision of Jerry Feldman…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nicholas v. Damian-RojasSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- Fahey v. Twin City Fan CompaniesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2014
- Samuels v. Twin RiversDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2023
- Velez v. AutoZoners, LLCDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2023