Hoover v. Due
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NORTHEASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL HOOVER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 2:22-cv-00051 ) JUSTIN DUE, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court are Defendant Putnam County Sheriff’s Office Deputy Justin Due’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 70) and Plaintiff Michael Hoover’s Partial Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 75). Both motions have been fully briefed and are ripe for review. (Doc. Nos. 71, 76, 82–83, 87–88). For the following reasons, the Court will grant in part and deny in part Due’s Motion for Summary…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.