Jackson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri; Arba S. Van Valkenburgh, Judge. Blyford B. Jackson was convicted under 19 separate counts of violating the Harrison Act, as amended, and he brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
MUNGER, District Judge.
The plaintiff in error, a physician, hereafter called defendant, was tried under an indictment, charging in each of 19 separate cotints, a violation of the Harrison Act (38 Stat. 785' [Comp. St. §§ 6287g-6287q]), as amended by sections 1006, 1007, 40 Stat. 1130 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, §§ 6287g, 6287/). *21He was found guilty and sentenced under 14 of the counts: The charges made against him were the unlawful sales of derivatives of opium and of coca leaves, not in pursuance of written orders on proper forms from the purchasers, by selling and dispensing the drugs to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hoke & Economides v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. BehrmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Jin Fuey Moy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Bennett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Bennett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nigro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Farr v. Pacific Gas and Electric Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Gillespie v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
- Nigro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941