Coffee v. Henry
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtReif, J.
¶1 The President Pro Tempore of the Oklahoma Senate and the Speaker of the Oklahoma House of Representatives have petitioned this Court to assume original juris*1057diction. They ask this Court to resolve their dispute with the Governor over use of the line item veto provided by Okla. Const. Art. 6, § 12. The Legislative Leadership specifically complains about two instances in the last Legislative session where the Governor used the line item veto to reject provisions in two bills-S.B. 1823 and H.B. 2286. The Legislative Leadership characterizes these bills as "general bills." They contend that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Christianson v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
3Cited by19 opinions
- INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 v. HOFMEISTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- VASQUEZ v. DILLARD'S, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- PRESCOTT v. OKLAHOMA CAPITOL PRESERVATION COMMISSIONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Gentges v. Oklahoma State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Hamrick v. STATE EX REL. OFFICE OF EX REL. CHIEF MEDICAL EXAMINERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.