Helton v. Factor 5, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Docket 97
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs,1 individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, bring the in*916stant action against Defendants to recover unpaid wages and other benefits under' state and federal law. The parties are presently before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment against the individual Defendants2 on their minimum wage claim under the Fan-Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 206.' Dkt. 97. The individual Defendants oppose the motion. Dkt. 113. Having read…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Taylor v. First Advantage Background Services Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Carlino v. CHG Medical Staffing, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Danielle Rollo v. Plaquemines Port Harbor and Terminal District and Charles TillotsonDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2026
- Demos v. InsleeDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
- Howell v. Advantage RN LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019