Creary v. Village of Mamaroneck
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Special Term erred in summarily dismissing so much of plaintiff’s complaint as sought to recover damages for malicious prosecution. An indispensible element of a claim for malicious prosecution is that the criminal proceeding instigated by the *871defendant terminate in favor of the accused (see, Hollender v Trump Vil. Coop., 58 NY2d 420, 425; Martin v City of Albany, 42 NY2d 13, 16; Burt v Smith, 181 NY 1, 5, appeal dismissed 203 US 129; State Bank of Albany v McAuliffe, 108 AD2d 979; Groat v Town Bd., 73 AD2d 426, 428, appeal dismissed 50 NY2d 928). For purposes of the Statute of Limitations,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Burt v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Martin v. City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Hollender v. Trump Village Cooperative, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Burt v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bryant v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Pritzker v. City of HudsonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
- Butler v. Town of SmithtownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Gilmore v. GoldDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986