Foster v. Lee Motors, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFess, J.
This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment entered by the Municipal Court of Toledo on behalf of the defendants. The case came on for trial without the intervention of a jury, and at the conclusion of plaintiff’s case a motion by defendants for judgment was sustained and the petition dismissed.
Prior to the abolition of the scintilla rule in Hamden Lodge v. Ohio Fuel Gas Co. (1934), 127 Ohio St., 469, 189 N. E., 246, the Supreme Court, in Euclid Arcade Building Co. v. H. A. Stahl Co. (1918), 99 Ohio St., 47, 121 N. E., 820, drew a distinction between a motion to direct a jury to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hamden Lodge No. 517 v. Ohio Fuel Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
- Matthews v. State Mortgage & Investment Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1928
- Sizemore v. BelserOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
3Cited by5 opinions
- James G. Smith & Associates, Inc. v. EverettOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
- Jacobs v. Board of County Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1971
- Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. WorrellOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Gest v. Piketon Lanes, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1965
- M. Steel, Inc. v. SeltzerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011