Legal Opinion

Greenwood v. Hassett

California Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1900No. S. F. No. 1567PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco. Action by one Greenwood and others against one Hassett and others. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal. Affirmed.

1Per curiam

Action to foreclose the lien of a street assessment. The defendants demurred to the complaint upon the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The court overruled the demurrer, and, the defendants having answered, the cause was tried by the court, and judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiffs. The defendants have appealed.

The demurrer to the complaint was properly overruled by the court.

1. It was not necessary to set forth in the complaint the specifications attached to the contract, and which formed a part thereof: California Improvement Co. v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Savings and Loan Society v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  2. California Improvement Co. v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Dean v. GrimesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Perine v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Wilson v. His CreditorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gay v. EngebretsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API