Legal Opinion

People v. Lindsey

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 30, 2018No. Appeal 3-15-0877UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDADE

*524 ¶ 1 In April 2014, the police used a trained drug-detection dog to conduct a free air sniff of the door handle and seams of defendant Jonathan Lindsey's motel room. The dog alerted to the presence of drugs inside the room, and the police obtained a search warrant. During their search, they found 4.7 grams of heroin, and Lindsey was charged with unlawful possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance while being within 1000 feet of a school. Lindsey filed a motion to suppress evidence, arguing that the dog sniff violated his fourth amendment rights. The trial court denied the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Florida v. JardinesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. LindseyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API