Legal Opinion

Denbo v. Sherrill

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 29, 1941No. 8 Div. 123PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Chief Justice.

The bill contains all essential averments (§ 9906, Code 1923), of one to quiet title to realty as specifically authorized by § 9905, Code 1923, and is properly to be so construed. Title 7, §§ 1109, 1110, Code 1940. True complainant goes beyond the statutory requirements in averments as to his own title, which allegations defendants insist disclose that his title is invalid, and it is upon this theory the Chancellor entertained the view the bill was without equity and entered the decree sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the bill.

But we have consistently construed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Goodman v. WinterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. Woodstock Iron Co. v. FullenwiderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  3. Grayson v. MuckleroySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Coburn v. CokeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. Wilson v. McKleroySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wiggins Estate Co. v. JefferySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. Federal Land Bank of New Orleans v. VinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  3. Wylie v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  4. Brownell v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. Swann v. WadsworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API