Legal Opinion

T & T Materials, Inc. v. Mooney

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 16, 2000No. 99-1425Published

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT L. Brown, Justice.

This appeal concerns the ability of a plaintiff-garnishor (T & T Materials, Inc.) to bring a separate fraud action against a garnishee (Northwest Paving Co., Inc.) and the original defendant (Willie Mooney). The trial court dismissed the separate fraud action, and the court of appeals affirmed. T &T Materials, Inc. v. Mooney, 68 Ark. App. 77, 4 S.W.3d 512 (1999). We granted review on February 3, 2000. We conclude that T & T’s remedy lay within the framework of the garnishment statutes, and we affirm the dismissal of the fraud action.

On January 6, 1997, Mooney agreed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Atkins Pickle Co., Inc. v. Burrough-Uerling-Brasuell Consulting Engineers, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Youngman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Eiermann v. BeckSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  4. Lisenby v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Arkansas, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  5. Spickes v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API