Lisenby v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Arkansas, Inc.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
The question here is whether homeowners whose house is destroyed by fire can maintain successive suits upon their fire insurance policy, first to recover for the loss of the house and then to recover for the loss of its contents. This appeal is from the trial court’s holding that the successful maintenance of the first suit was bar to the second suit. We hold that the court’s conclusion was correct.
The Lisenbys obtained from the appellee a homeowner’s policy which insured their dwelling for $10,000 and its contents for 40% of that amount. House and contents were…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- National Union Fire Insurance Company v. HenrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Eiermann v. BeckSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- State Life Insurance v. GoodrumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance v. ChisenhallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
3Cited by13 opinions
- Martin v. ArthurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Mountain Pure, LLC v. Turner Holdings, LLC Portola Packaging, Inc. Stone Container Corporation Consolidated Container Company, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Coleman's Service Center, Inc. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
- Nineteen Corp. v. Guaranty Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- Dawson v. GerritsenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.