Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Halleck

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 3, 1966No. Civ. A. 375-66PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

This is an action for relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus brought by a person who has been indicted by the grand jury and is awaiting trial on a criminal charge in this Court, against a Judge of the District of Columbia Court of General Sessions, who, as a committing magistrate, conducted the preliminary hearing in the case which later eventuated in the indictment.

At the preliminary hearing the plaintiff, who is the defendant in the criminal case, was represented by counsel, who had a full opportunity to cross-examine witnesses. The plaintiff now seeks a…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Milton Robbins A/K/A Mickey Robbins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. William Joseph MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. DockeryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. United States v. AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Butts v. Justices of the Court of Special SessionsNew York Supreme Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API