Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Akers

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 8, 1915PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Chancery Branch, First Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Carroll

Affirming,

On June 4, 1909, the appellant, Ferguson, submitted to the appellee, Akers, the following proposition in writing:

*290“I hereby propose to sell to you 346% shares of the Common Stock of the Louisville Soap Company for thq sum of $27,500; provided you make payment at thq present time of $500, which payment, in the event that this proposition should be accepted, is to be applied as part of the purchase price; but, in the event that this proposition is not accepted, the said sum' of $500 is to be the consideration for the making of this proposition and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Western Manufacturing Co. v. CottonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  2. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. MattinglyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  3. United Talking Machine Co. v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Crawford v. M. Livingston & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  5. McGregor v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Graves v. WinerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  2. Pickrell & Craig Co. v. Castleman Blakemore Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Southeastern Land Co. v. JonnardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  4. Provident Life & Accident Insurance v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  5. Brandenburg v. W. T. B. Williams Sons, Bnkrs.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API