Legal Opinion

Sconyers v. Town of Coffee Springs

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 28, 1935No. 4 Div. 816PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

It is recited in the opinion of the Court of Appeals that the ordinance in question was introduced in evidence, that specific grounds of objection were assigned- — as those passed upon by former application to this court — ; and that the ordinance does not purport to have .been published as required by law to become effective.

The last-stated ground was before the court, but not presented for decision when petition for certiorari was heretofore granted.

It is recited, as findings of fact by the Court of Appeals, (1) that the ordinance offered in evidence and to which objection…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Town of Valley HeadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Titus v. BraidfootSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Smith v. Town of EclecticAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Ex Parte City of AlbanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Barrow v. City of BessemerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pappas v. Alabama Power CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  2. Roach v. City of TuscumbiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. Patton v. City of DecaturCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API