Hammond v. City of Harvard
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Clay county. Tried below before Morris, J. cited: Reardon v. San Francisco, 6 Pac. Rep., 325-6; City of Denver v. Bayer, 2 Id., 9; Mollandin v. R. Co., 14 Fed.
Read the full summary
Error to the district court for Clay county. Tried below before Morris, J. cited: Reardon v. San Francisco, 6 Pac. Rep., 325-6; City of Denver v. Bayer, 2 Id., 9; Mollandin v. R. Co., 14 Fed. Rep., 394; Rigney v. Chicago, 102 111., 64; Goüschalh v. R. Co., 14 Neb., 550; Harman, v. Omaha, 23 N. W. Rep., 503; R. V R. Co. v. Fellers, 20 Id., 217; B. & M. R. R. Co. v. Reinhaóhle, 18 Id., 69; Schuller v. Omaha, 36 Id., 533; Wagner v. Gage Co., 3 Neb., 242 ; F., E. & M. V. R. Co. v. Whalen, 11 Id., 591; “Damage,” Webster’scDic.; 2 Black Com., cli. 29, p. 438; Coke Litt., 257a; 2 Green. Ev. [12th…
1Opinion of the Court
Cobb, Ch. J.
The plaintiff alleges in his petition:
“1. The incorporation of the defendant; plaintiff’s ownership and possession of lot No. 355 in defendant city; the erection thereon by him, in 1879, of a brick structure eighty feet long by twenty-two wide; the arrangement of the interior thereof at great expense for the special business of a retail dry goods and clothing house; its exclusive use for that purpose for a number of years consecutively, prior and up to the date ot this action; and a monthly rental of the same for that time, of $30.
“ 2. The establishment of a grade on Clay avenue…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Harmon v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
- Nebraska City v. LampkinNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brown v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Sallden v. City of Little FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- McGavock v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Propst v. Cass CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Hodges v. Board of SupervisorsNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.