Legal Opinion

MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE CO., INC. v. Lark

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided January 6, 2005No. 04-60128Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BATTANI, District Judge.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Michigan Bell Telephone Company’s d/b/a SBC Michigan (“SBC Michigan”) Motion for Summary Judgment brought pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). At issue is the validity of a June 29, 2004 Order in case number U-13891, issued by the Michigan Public Service Commission (“MPSC”), acting through Defendant Commissioners, J. Peter Lark, Laura Chappelle and Robert B. Nelson. The parties stipulated to allow AT & T Communications of Michigan, Inc. (“AT & T”) to intervene pursuant to Fed.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Teleconcepts, Incorporated, Defendant/third-Party v. Bell of Pennsylvania, Third-Party Teleconcepts, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  5. Reiter v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API