MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE CO., INC. v. Lark
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BATTANI, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiff Michigan Bell Telephone Company’s d/b/a SBC Michigan (“SBC Michigan”) Motion for Summary Judgment brought pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). At issue is the validity of a June 29, 2004 Order in case number U-13891, issued by the Michigan Public Service Commission (“MPSC”), acting through Defendant Commissioners, J. Peter Lark, Laura Chappelle and Robert B. Nelson. The parties stipulated to allow AT & T Communications of Michigan, Inc. (“AT & T”) to intervene pursuant to Fed.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Teleconcepts, Incorporated, Defendant/third-Party v. Bell of Pennsylvania, Third-Party Teleconcepts, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Reiter v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.