Legal Opinion
Ridge v. Berryhill
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 30, 2018No. 17–CV–645 (JFB)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge:
Plaintiff Mark Ridge ("plaintiff") commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of the Social Security Act on February 3, 2017, challenging the final decision of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the "Commissioner" or the "government") denying plaintiff's application for Social Security disability benefits on December 12, 2016. An Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") determined that plaintiff had the residual functional capacity to perform light work, as defined in 20 C.F.R. § 404.1567(b), with certain limitations. The ALJ found that there were a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Burgess v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Albizu v. BerryhillDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Bowen v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2022
- Daly v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- Dechbery v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020
- Demosthenous v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.