Legal Opinion

State v. Powell

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 12, 2009No. 37122-7-IIPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.

¶1 Jesse William Powell appeals his second degree rape jury conviction, under RCW 9A.44.050(l)(b), for engaging in sexual intercourse with another person when the victim was incapable of consent by reason of being physically helpless or mentally incapacitated. He argues that he received ineffective assistance from his trial counsel, who failed to propose a jury instruction on the “reasonable belief” defense, RCW 9A.44.030(1).1 Following In re Personal Restraint of Hubert, 138 Wn. App. 924, 158 P.3d 1282 (2007), we hold that the lack of a “reasonable belief” instruction prejudiced Powell’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. CalvinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. State v. FloraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. State v. WaltersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API