Legal Opinion
Hopkins v. Carlock Nissan of Tupelo, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Decided November 18, 2022No. 1:21-cv-00189Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION JOSHUA HOPKINS PLAINTIFF V. NO. 1:21-CV-189-DMB-RP CARLOCK NISSAN OF TUPELO, INC. DEFENDANT OPINION AND ORDER Joshua Hopkins alleges, among other claims, that Carlock Nissan of Tupelo, Inc., terminated him as the result of retaliation unlawful under Title VII, specifically, because he opposed what he believed to be unlawful sexual harassment of Carlock Nissan customers. Carlock Nissan moves to dismiss the retaliation claim. Because the Court concludes it was not reasonable for Hopkins to believe the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Turner v. Baylor Richardson Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Fayette Long Jeanell Reavis v. Eastfield CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Lashawnda Brown v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., etCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.