Legal Opinion

Oryx Energy Co. v. Barrett Resources Corp.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 26, 1996No. 87053Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSEN, Presiding Judge:

Appellants, Oryx Energy Company (Oryx) and Amoco Production Company (Amoco) (collectively Appellants),1 seek review of a Corporation Commission (Commission)2 order, which, among other things, established a priority production schedule for the gas wells located within a single drilling and spacing unit

Oryx is the operator of the Allen drilling and spacing unit comprised of section 20-15N-13W, Blaine County, Oklahoma. Four wells have been drilled in the unit. The No. 1 well was plugged and abandoned. The No. *2302 well was completed in the Morrow common source of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Forest Oil Corp. v. Corporation Com'n of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Union Texas Petroleum, a Division of Allied Chemical Corp. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Oklahoma Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. DLB Energy Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. Pelican Production Corp. v. Wishbone Oil & Gas, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API