Legal Opinion

City of New York v. Torres

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 24, 1995Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order dated August 7, 1992 affirmed, with $10 costs.

*1038Landlord, the City of New York (City), terminated tenant’s month-to-month tenancy upon the ground that "a vacate order was duly issued by the Department of Housing Preservation and Development * * * requiring that you vacate the premises”. Tenant had been previously notified in writing by the Department of Housing Preservation and Development (DHPD) that: "a vacate order has been placed on the building you now occupy. It will be necessary for you to vacate as soon as possible because the building is in a condition which…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. MSG Pomp Corp. v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Giannini v. StuartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  3. Henderson v. PopolizioNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Lacks v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API