Legal Opinion
World Wide Prosthetic Supply, Inc. v. Mikulsky
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided March 19, 2002No. 00-1751PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAnn Walsh Bradley, J.
¶ 1. The petitioners, Robert J. Mikulsky and Karen Mikulsky, doing business as Enterprise Machine and Voyager, Inc., seek review of a published court of appeals decision that reversed a circuit court order declaring a mistrial and remanded for a new trial. They argue that the court of appeals erred in concluding that World Wide Prosthetic Supply, Inc. could recover as damages its lost profits allegedly resulting from Voyager's manufacture and distribution of a defective product incorporating World Wide's trade secret.
¶ 2. In essence, the petitioners assert that the court of appeals…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Wangen v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fandrey v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Catalyst & Chemical Services, Inc. v. Global Ground SupportDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Burbank Grease Services, LLC v. SokolowskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
- Conley Publishing Group Ltd. v. Journal Communications, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.