Legal Opinion

United States v. United States Currency in the Sum of Three Hundred Ninety-Three Thousand Nine Hundred Sixty-Seven ($393,967) Dollars More or Less

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 30, 1991No. CV 90-3068 (ADS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

SPATT, District Judge.

In this civil forfeiture action, the Court is asked to determine whether the default of the claimant, Nidia Campos (“Campos”), should be excused and whether the Court should grant her motion to vacate a decree of forfeiture and enlarge the time within which to submit a claim and to file an answer. For the reasons set forth below, the claimant’s motion to vacate the decree of forfeiture is denied.

BACKGROUND

The claimant Campos is currently incarcerated in relation to a criminal action pending before the Honorable Carol Amon, and entitled United…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fred Traguth and Otto Handtke, Individually and Doing Business as Dance Motion Press v. D'LeLa ZuckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  2. United States v. $55,518.05 in U.S. Currency. Appeal of Gary GoldenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  3. One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Seven Elves, Incorporated v. Jack S. Eskenazi, Esko Industries, Inc., Gary Liebman and Jack RibackCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Davis v. MuslerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. ScottDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1992
  2. Torres v. $36,256.80 U.S. CurrencyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  3. United States v. Certain Funds Contained in Account Nos. 600-306211-006, 600-306211-011 & 600-306211-014District Court, E.D. New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API