Legal Opinion

Carr v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 30, 2006No. A06A1365PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Chief Judge.

Bernard Carr entered a guilty plea to charges of armed robbery and voluntary manslaughter. Carr later filed a “petition to correct [a] void sentence,” arguing that the sentence was illegal because the crime of armed robbery merged with the crime of voluntary manslaughter. The trial court denied his motion, and Carr appeals. As we find Carr waived any objection to his sentence by entering a guilty plea to the charges and specifically agreeing to separate, concurrent sentences for each charge, in exchange for the dismissal of five other charges, we affirm.

“Because the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Curtis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  2. Smith v. HardrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  3. Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  4. Glover v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. Harmon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nazario v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. Turner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  4. Regent v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  5. Sanders v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API