Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hardrick

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 4, 1995No. S95A1701PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, Justice.

The State appeals the granting of relief to Petitioner Hardrick under the writ of habeas corpus. Because we find that Hardrick was convicted and sentenced upon an indictment that was so fundamentally flawed as to charge no crime at all, we affirm.

In November 1993, Hardrick was indicted on charges of rape, aggravated assault, and aggravated sodomy. On the State’s motion, orders of nolle prosequi were entered on the charges of rape and aggravated sodomy, and the State proceeded against Hardrick only on the aggravated assault charge. That particular charge was set forth in Count…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. O'Brien v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Frost v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  5. State v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Nazario v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  2. Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  3. Harwell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  4. Sallie v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  5. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API