Legal Opinion

Cadagan v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1941No. Docket No. 14, Calendar No. 41,372PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Plaintiff in a suit against defendant for damages sustained by way of personal injuries alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence had verdict on trial by jury. Judgment was enteréd thereon and defendant has appealed.

Defendant owned and operated a so-called supermarket on the east side of Hamilton avenue in the city of Detroit. The store building is located 22 feet back from the curb line. Adjacent to the curb there is a six-foot concrete sidewalk, and leading from this sidewalk to the store building there is a wide concrete walk. Also along the front of the building and adjacent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stern v. FranklinMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Plotner v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Vincent v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Felgner v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Modzel v. Norwalk Truck LinesMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Staphan L. Koserkoff, and Cross-Appellant v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  4. Cheryl Dorsey v. Taubman Auburn Hills AssociatesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Felgner v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API