Legal Opinion

Stern v. Franklin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1939No. Docket No. 66, Calendar No. 40,521PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Plaintiff’s snit is for damages which she seeks because of personal injuries alleged to have been sustained as a result of defendant’s negligence. Defendant’s motion to dismiss, on the ground that plaintiff’s declaration does not state a cause of action, was granted. Plaintiff has appealed.

The facts as pleaded are as follows: On Saturday, July 9,1938, plaintiff and two other ladies were guests of defendant at his cottage at Clark Lake, a small body of water near Jackson. Late that night at defendant’s invitation the four went for a ride in defendant’s motor boat. Shortly after midiiight…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rice v. Goodspeed Real Estate Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Erdman v. Johnson Bros. Radio & Television Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  2. Armstrong v. LeBlancMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Stuchbery v. HarperIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Cashell v. HartDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  5. Milauckas v. MeyerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API