Legal Opinion

Call v. Call

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 26, 1963Published

1Opinion of the Court

MOREMEN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Pike Circuit Court ordering the sale of real estate for the purpose of reinvestment of the proceeds under KRS 389.040, which reads in part as follows:

“Remainder and contingent interest in real estate may be sold upon petition of any person having a present or vested interest, all persons in being having any interest in such estate being made parties to the action. If the court shall be satisfied that the interest of all concerned would be subserved by such sale, it shall adjudge accordingly; which judgment and sale thereunder shall…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goff v. RenickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  2. Luttrell v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
  3. McClure v. CrumeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  4. Caulder v. Chenault'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  5. Tierney Coal Co. v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API