California Canneries Co. v. Scatena
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. A. A. Sanderson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
Appeals by defendants from the judgment and order denying a new trial.
In the complaint it is averred, substantially, that “on or about the fourth day of August, 1894,” plaintiff purchased of the defendants, Lorenzo Scatena and A. P. Giannini, copartners, doing business under the firm name of “L. Scatena & Co.,” and said defendants, under said firm name, sold to plaintiff one hundred and fifty tons of peaches of certain named varieties for the price of twenty dollars per ton, delivered to plaintiff; that defendants refused to deliver the peaches, or any of them, although demanded, etc.; and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lane v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Coon v. RigdenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1878
3Cited by18 opinions
- Marks v. Walter G. McCarty Corp.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Little v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
- Sterling v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Kilday v. SchancuppSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.