Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Grady

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 19, 1993PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel disclosure of the District Attorney’s instructions to the Grand Jury with regard to Dutchess County Indictment No. 132/78, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Bernhard, J.), dated January 18, 1991, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner failed to demonstrate a compelling and particularized need for access to the Grand Jury minutes which he seeks (see, Matter of District Attorney of Suffolk County, 58 NY2d 436, 444). We…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re District AttorneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Moore v. SantucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harvey v. HynesNew York Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Mullgrav v. SantucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Hall v. BongiornoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. People v. SeeleyNew York Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Bridgewater v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API