Legal Opinion
People v. Seeley
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 30, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
John M. Leventhal, J.
Defendant moves to have the People produce specified documents. Defendant claims that the records are vital to the preparation of her defense based upon the “Battered Woman’s Syndrome” (BWS). Defendant has commenced three separate proceedings for the documents. Defendant has issued a subpoena for these documents, requested the material under the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law § 87 [FOIL]), and requested the material under CPL article 240.
In deciding this motion the court has considered defendant’s omnibus motion, the People’s answer to…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- People v. MendozaNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. GoetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Green v. GiulianiNew York Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. SeeleyNew York Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. CeasarNew York Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. CuberoNew York Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. TorresNew York Supreme Court · 2000